mixed-effects analysis Search Results


function glm  (MathSoft Inc)
90
MathSoft Inc function glm
Function Glm, supplied by MathSoft Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mixed-effects+analysis/mixed+effects+model+analysis+splus+2000+version+3/pm12796040-75-39-44
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
function glm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
mixed effects poisson regression coefficient analysis  (CH Instruments)
90
CH Instruments mixed effects poisson regression coefficient analysis
Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression <t>Coefficient</t> analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). In both panels, Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar does not cross the dotted line.
Mixed Effects Poisson Regression Coefficient Analysis, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mixed-effects+analysis/mixed+effects+poisson+regression+coefficient+analysis/pmc06834556-78-25-85
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mixed effects poisson regression coefficient analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
generalized linear mixed-effect model analysis  (Gauch GmbH)
90
Gauch GmbH generalized linear mixed-effect model analysis
Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression <t>Coefficient</t> analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). In both panels, Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar does not cross the dotted line.
Generalized Linear Mixed Effect Model Analysis, supplied by Gauch GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mixed-effects+analysis/generalized+linear+mixed+effect+model+analysis/pmc03074061-119-9-12
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
generalized linear mixed-effect model analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
mixed-effects analysis with tukey's correction factor  (CH Instruments)
90
CH Instruments mixed-effects analysis with tukey's correction factor
Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression <t>Coefficient</t> analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). In both panels, Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar does not cross the dotted line.
Mixed Effects Analysis With Tukey's Correction Factor, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mixed-effects+analysis/mixed+effects+analysis+with+tukey+s+correction+factor/pmc08131307-137-12-20
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mixed-effects analysis with tukey's correction factor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
effects analysis  (Janssen)
86
Janssen effects analysis
Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression <t>Coefficient</t> analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). In both panels, Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar does not cross the dotted line.
Effects Analysis, supplied by Janssen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mixed-effects+analysis/analysis+effects+mixed/us12599606-467-13-21
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
effects analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression Coefficient analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). In both panels, Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar does not cross the dotted line.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Physiological and economic benefits of abandoning invasive surgical procedures and enhancing animal welfare in swine production

doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52677-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression Coefficient analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). In both panels, Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar does not cross the dotted line.

Article Snippet: Figure 2 Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression Coefficient analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars).

Techniques: Control

Hair and saliva cortisol concentrations in piglets/pigs, as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. Individual hair cortisol concentrations at weaning ( a ) and slaughter ( b ) were analyzed by Multi Variate Linear regression test (controlled for variables: mother cortisol, weaning weight and suckling period). Saliva was collected for cortisol measurements at the pen level, every two weeks from weaning to slaughter, and the results are presented in ( c ) and ( d ). ( c ) Samples were clustered together per group, without taking the sample date into consideration; a mixed effect linear regression model was used for statistical analysis (Random effect: pen. Predictor: treatment group. Adjusted for: tail biting, leg injuries, skin lesions, weakness and survival). ( d ) Analysis of saliva cortisol in Group 2-4, as compared to Group 1; for the statistical analysis, time varying group effects was applied, using log-level regressions on group identifiers and individual treatments, standard errors were clustered at the pen level. In all panels, data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars); Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar do not cross the dotted line.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Physiological and economic benefits of abandoning invasive surgical procedures and enhancing animal welfare in swine production

doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52677-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Hair and saliva cortisol concentrations in piglets/pigs, as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. Individual hair cortisol concentrations at weaning ( a ) and slaughter ( b ) were analyzed by Multi Variate Linear regression test (controlled for variables: mother cortisol, weaning weight and suckling period). Saliva was collected for cortisol measurements at the pen level, every two weeks from weaning to slaughter, and the results are presented in ( c ) and ( d ). ( c ) Samples were clustered together per group, without taking the sample date into consideration; a mixed effect linear regression model was used for statistical analysis (Random effect: pen. Predictor: treatment group. Adjusted for: tail biting, leg injuries, skin lesions, weakness and survival). ( d ) Analysis of saliva cortisol in Group 2-4, as compared to Group 1; for the statistical analysis, time varying group effects was applied, using log-level regressions on group identifiers and individual treatments, standard errors were clustered at the pen level. In all panels, data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars); Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar do not cross the dotted line.

Article Snippet: Figure 2 Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression Coefficient analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars).

Techniques: