mixed-effects analysis Search Results


90
SAS institute mixed-effects analysis of variance (anova)
Mixed Effects Analysis Of Variance (Anova), supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mixed-effects analysis of variance (anova)/product/SAS institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mixed-effects analysis of variance (anova) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc anova, mixed effect analysis
To assess the possible effects <t>of</t> <t>histamine</t> on the degree of erythema within the high‐density microarray patch (HD‐MAP) application area, TiVi data before and after histamine challenge were compared using repeated‐measures one‐way <t>ANOVA,</t> mixed effect analysis, α = 0.05. Asterisks mark significant changes
Anova, Mixed Effect Analysis, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anova, mixed effect analysis/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anova, mixed effect analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc mixed effects analysis bonferroni’s multiple comparison test
To assess the possible effects <t>of</t> <t>histamine</t> on the degree of erythema within the high‐density microarray patch (HD‐MAP) application area, TiVi data before and after histamine challenge were compared using repeated‐measures one‐way <t>ANOVA,</t> mixed effect analysis, α = 0.05. Asterisks mark significant changes
Mixed Effects Analysis Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mixed effects analysis bonferroni’s multiple comparison test/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mixed effects analysis bonferroni’s multiple comparison test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
CH Instruments mixed effects poisson regression coefficient analysis
Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression <t>Coefficient</t> analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). In both panels, Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar does not cross the dotted line.
Mixed Effects Poisson Regression Coefficient Analysis, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mixed effects poisson regression coefficient analysis/product/CH Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mixed effects poisson regression coefficient analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc repeated measures, two-way analysis of varoiance (anova) or mixed effects model
Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression <t>Coefficient</t> analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). In both panels, Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar does not cross the dotted line.
Repeated Measures, Two Way Analysis Of Varoiance (Anova) Or Mixed Effects Model, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/repeated measures, two-way analysis of varoiance (anova) or mixed effects model/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
repeated measures, two-way analysis of varoiance (anova) or mixed effects model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc mixed-effects model analysis in graphpad prism v. 10.0
Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression <t>Coefficient</t> analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). In both panels, Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar does not cross the dotted line.
Mixed Effects Model Analysis In Graphpad Prism V. 10.0, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mixed-effects model analysis in graphpad prism v. 10.0/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mixed-effects model analysis in graphpad prism v. 10.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathSoft Inc linear mixed effects model splus 2000 professional edition release 3
Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression <t>Coefficient</t> analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). In both panels, Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar does not cross the dotted line.
Linear Mixed Effects Model Splus 2000 Professional Edition Release 3, supplied by MathSoft Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/linear mixed effects model splus 2000 professional edition release 3/product/MathSoft Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
linear mixed effects model splus 2000 professional edition release 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Minitab Inc mixed-effects analysis of variance (anova) software
Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression <t>Coefficient</t> analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). In both panels, Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar does not cross the dotted line.
Mixed Effects Analysis Of Variance (Anova) Software, supplied by Minitab Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mixed-effects analysis of variance (anova) software/product/Minitab Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mixed-effects analysis of variance (anova) software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc mixed-effects analysis with geisser-greenhouse’s correction
Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression <t>Coefficient</t> analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). In both panels, Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar does not cross the dotted line.
Mixed Effects Analysis With Geisser Greenhouse’s Correction, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mixed-effects analysis with geisser-greenhouse’s correction/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mixed-effects analysis with geisser-greenhouse’s correction - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SAS institute mixed-effects repeated measures analysis (proc mixed)
Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression <t>Coefficient</t> analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). In both panels, Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar does not cross the dotted line.
Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Analysis (Proc Mixed), supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mixed-effects repeated measures analysis (proc mixed)/product/SAS institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mixed-effects repeated measures analysis (proc mixed) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SAS institute random-effects analysis of variance (anova) sas proc mixed
Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression <t>Coefficient</t> analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). In both panels, Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar does not cross the dotted line.
Random Effects Analysis Of Variance (Anova) Sas Proc Mixed, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/random-effects analysis of variance (anova) sas proc mixed/product/SAS institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
random-effects analysis of variance (anova) sas proc mixed - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc mixed effects analysis, one- and two-way anova
Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression <t>Coefficient</t> analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). In both panels, Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar does not cross the dotted line.
Mixed Effects Analysis, One And Two Way Anova, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mixed effects analysis, one- and two-way anova/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mixed effects analysis, one- and two-way anova - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


To assess the possible effects of histamine on the degree of erythema within the high‐density microarray patch (HD‐MAP) application area, TiVi data before and after histamine challenge were compared using repeated‐measures one‐way ANOVA, mixed effect analysis, α = 0.05. Asterisks mark significant changes

Journal: Skin Research and Technology

Article Title: Micropuncture closure following high density microarray patch application in healthy subjects

doi: 10.1111/srt.13131

Figure Lengend Snippet: To assess the possible effects of histamine on the degree of erythema within the high‐density microarray patch (HD‐MAP) application area, TiVi data before and after histamine challenge were compared using repeated‐measures one‐way ANOVA, mixed effect analysis, α = 0.05. Asterisks mark significant changes

Article Snippet: TEWL and TiVi data before and after histamine challenge were compared using repeated‐measures one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA), mixed effect analysis, α = 0.05 (GraphPad Prism version 9.1.2 for Windows, GraphPad Software, San Diego, California USA, www.graphpad.com ).

Techniques: Microarray

Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression Coefficient analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). In both panels, Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar does not cross the dotted line.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Physiological and economic benefits of abandoning invasive surgical procedures and enhancing animal welfare in swine production

doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52677-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression Coefficient analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). In both panels, Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar does not cross the dotted line.

Article Snippet: Figure 2 Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression Coefficient analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars).

Techniques: Control

Hair and saliva cortisol concentrations in piglets/pigs, as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. Individual hair cortisol concentrations at weaning ( a ) and slaughter ( b ) were analyzed by Multi Variate Linear regression test (controlled for variables: mother cortisol, weaning weight and suckling period). Saliva was collected for cortisol measurements at the pen level, every two weeks from weaning to slaughter, and the results are presented in ( c ) and ( d ). ( c ) Samples were clustered together per group, without taking the sample date into consideration; a mixed effect linear regression model was used for statistical analysis (Random effect: pen. Predictor: treatment group. Adjusted for: tail biting, leg injuries, skin lesions, weakness and survival). ( d ) Analysis of saliva cortisol in Group 2-4, as compared to Group 1; for the statistical analysis, time varying group effects was applied, using log-level regressions on group identifiers and individual treatments, standard errors were clustered at the pen level. In all panels, data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars); Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar do not cross the dotted line.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Physiological and economic benefits of abandoning invasive surgical procedures and enhancing animal welfare in swine production

doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52677-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Hair and saliva cortisol concentrations in piglets/pigs, as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. Individual hair cortisol concentrations at weaning ( a ) and slaughter ( b ) were analyzed by Multi Variate Linear regression test (controlled for variables: mother cortisol, weaning weight and suckling period). Saliva was collected for cortisol measurements at the pen level, every two weeks from weaning to slaughter, and the results are presented in ( c ) and ( d ). ( c ) Samples were clustered together per group, without taking the sample date into consideration; a mixed effect linear regression model was used for statistical analysis (Random effect: pen. Predictor: treatment group. Adjusted for: tail biting, leg injuries, skin lesions, weakness and survival). ( d ) Analysis of saliva cortisol in Group 2-4, as compared to Group 1; for the statistical analysis, time varying group effects was applied, using log-level regressions on group identifiers and individual treatments, standard errors were clustered at the pen level. In all panels, data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars); Group 1 is represented by the horizontal dotted line; values significantly differed ( P < 0.05) from Group 1 if the bar do not cross the dotted line.

Article Snippet: Figure 2 Injuries, weakness and mortality of piglets/pigs as husbandry invasive surgical procedures were gradually avoided and meaningful environmental enrichment was provided. ( a ) Mixed effects Poisson Regression Coefficient analysis of injuries occurrence in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1; G1); data is presented as coefficient (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars). ( b ) Odds Ratio to be weak or dead in Groups 2-4 (G2-4) as compared to the control group (Group 1); data was analyzed by a chi-square goodness of fit test and the Binominal test, and is presented as Odds Ratio (sign) and 95% confidence interval (bars).

Techniques: